GLM-4.5: Unified Breakthrough in Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abilities
“
July 28, 2025 · Research
Keywords: Large Language Models, AI Agents, Code Generation, Reasoning Capabilities, GLM-4.5
Why We Need Generalist AI Models?
Current AI development faces a critical challenge: specialized models excel in narrow domains but lack comprehensive abilities. For example:
-
Some models solve complex math problems but struggle with code generation -
Others handle tool interactions but fail at deep logical reasoning -
Most require switching between specialized models for different tasks
GLM-4.5’s mission: Unify reasoning, coding, and agentic capabilities within a single model to meet growing demands of complex AI applications.
Core Features at a Glance
Feature | GLM-4.5 | GLM-4.5-Air |
---|---|---|
Parameters | 355B total / 32B active | 106B total / 12B active |
Reasoning Modes | Thinking Mode (complex tasks) Non-Thinking Mode (simple queries) |
Same |
Context Window | 128K tokens | Same |
Native Tool Calling | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
Access | Z.ai Platform HuggingFace |
Same |
Performance Benchmarks: Triple Capability Validation
(1) Agentic Abilities: Tool Usage & Web Interaction
Competitive results across three industry tests:
Benchmark | GLM-4.5 Score | Key Comparison |
---|---|---|
TAU-bench | 70.1 | Claude 4 Opus (70.5) |
BFCL v3 | 77.8 | Claude 4 Sonnet (75.2) |
BrowseComp | 26.4% | o4-mini-high (28.3%) |
“
Real-world application:
When asked “Latest breakthroughs in quantum computing for 2025”, GLM-4.5 autonomously uses browsing tools to retrieve recent papers and extracts key findings.
(2) Reasoning Capabilities: Math/Science/Logic Mastery

Benchmark | GLM-4.5 Score | Key Comparison |
---|---|---|
MMLU Pro | 84.6 | GPT-4.1 (85.3) |
AIME24 | 91.0 | Outperforms Claude 4 Opus (75.7) |
MATH 500 | 98.2 | Near-human expert level |
Science (SciCode) | 41.7 | Leads open-source models |
“
Note: Volatile benchmarks like AIME24 use 32-sample averaging for stability.
(3) Coding Prowess: Full-Stack Development
Real-world development validation:
Test | GLM-4.5 Score | Industry Comparison |
---|---|---|
SWE-bench Verified | 64.2 | Beats GPT-4.1 (48.6) |
Terminal-Bench | 37.5 | Leads Gemini 2.5 Pro (25.3) |
Tool Success Rate | 90.6% | Claude-4-Sonnet (89.5%) |
Full-stack demonstration:
Command: “Create user management system with login UI and database” generates:
-
React frontend components -
Flask backend APIs -
MySQL schema
Complete code: GitHub Repository
Technical Innovations: The Unification Framework
Architectural Breakthrough: Depth-Optimized MoE Design

Innovation | GLM-4.5 Implementation | Industry Differentiation |
---|---|---|
MoE Routing | Loss-free balance + Sigmoid gating | Prevents expert imbalance |
Model Geometry | Reduced width, increased depth | Boosts reasoning (e.g., MMLU +12%) |
Attention Mechanism | 96-head Grouped-Query + Partial RoPE | Efficient long-sequence processing |
Training Optimizer | Muon Optimizer | Enables larger batches, faster convergence |
Training Strategy: Four-Stage Capability Fusion
graph LR
A[General Pretraining] --> B[Code/Reasoning Specialization]
B --> C[Domain Fine-Tuning]
C --> D[Reinforcement Learning]
-
General Pretraining: 15T token universal corpus -
Specialized Enhancement: 7T token code/reasoning corpus -
Domain Tuning: Medium-scale domain datasets (including instructions) -
RL Optimization: Reinforcement learning via slime framework
Reinforcement Learning Engine: slime’s Triple Innovation

Technical Challenge | slime Solution | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|
Slow data generation | Decoupled architecture: Separate training/rollout | 40%+ GPU utilization gain |
Long-task instability | Mixed precision: FP8 generation + BF16 training | 3x throughput increase |
Framework incompatibility | Unified multi-agent interface | Seamless Claude Code integration |
Practical Applications: From Slides to Full-Stack Development
Application 1: Intelligent Presentation Creation
Workflow:
-
User request: “Create 5-slide presentation about quantum computing” -
GLM-4.5 autonomously: -
Searches web for updated content -
Designs visual layouts -
Outputs playable HTML slides
-
Application 2: End-to-End Web Development
Case Study:
-
User provides basic template -
Iterative development via conversation: -
“Add user comment feature” -
“Integrate payment gateway”
-
-
Outputs production-ready code
Live Demo
Application 3: Toolchain Integration
Seamless compatibility with development ecosystems:
# Using GLM-4.5 with Claude Code
from claude_code import Agent
agent = Agent(model="glm-4.5")
agent.execute_task("Analyze sales.csv and generate visual report")
Supported frameworks:
Getting Started with GLM-4.5
Option 1: Online Access (Zero Setup)
-
Visit Z.ai Platform -
Select “GLM-4.5” model -
Directly test capabilities: -
Generate interactive games -
Create physics simulations -
Design marketing posters
-
Option 2: API Integration (Developers)
# OpenAI-compatible endpoint
curl https://api.z.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
-d '{
"model": "glm-4.5",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Extract insights from this PDF..."}]
}'
Option 3: Local Deployment (High Performance)
# vLLM deployment example
pip install vllm
python -m vllm.entrypoint \
--model zai-org/glm-4.5-base \
--tensor-parallel-size 4
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: How does GLM-4.5 differ from GPT-4.1?
Key distinction: Capability unification
-
GLM-4.5: Single model handles reasoning/coding/tool use -
GPT-4.1: Requires specialized models (e.g., Codex for programming)
Q2: Which version suits smaller projects – GLM-4.5 or Air?
Selection guide:
Scenario | Recommended | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Local deployment / Cost-sensitive | GLM-4.5-Air | 12B active parameters, lower resource needs |
Complex tasks / Peak performance | GLM-4.5 | 32B active parameters, 15%+ performance gain |
Q3: How to troubleshoot failed tool calls?
Debugging steps:
-
Activate Thinking Mode
(not Non-Thinking Mode) -
Verify function descriptions follow OpenAPI specs -
Include examples: Provide tool-call demonstrations in prompts
Q4: Is commercial use permitted?
Licensing:
-
Z.ai API usage: Follow platform commercial policy -
Local deployment: Apache 2.0 license for open weights
Conclusion: Toward General-Purpose AI
GLM-4.5 achieves unification through:
-
Depth-optimized MoE architecture: Balances efficiency and reasoning -
Four-stage training: Integrates general and specialized capabilities -
slime RL framework: Solves long-horizon task challenges
First single model to simultaneously deliver:
-
Reasoning: Competition-level math (AIME24: 91.0) -
Coding: Full-stack development (90.6% tool success) -
Agents: Complex web interaction (BrowseComp beats Claude 4 Opus)
Experience now: https://chat.z.ai
Source code: GitHub Repository