GLM-4.5: Unified Breakthrough in Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abilities

July 28, 2025 · Research
Keywords: Large Language Models, AI Agents, Code Generation, Reasoning Capabilities, GLM-4.5


Why We Need Generalist AI Models?

Current AI development faces a critical challenge: specialized models excel in narrow domains but lack comprehensive abilities. For example:

  • Some models solve complex math problems but struggle with code generation
  • Others handle tool interactions but fail at deep logical reasoning
  • Most require switching between specialized models for different tasks

GLM-4.5’s mission: Unify reasoning, coding, and agentic capabilities within a single model to meet growing demands of complex AI applications.


Core Features at a Glance

Feature GLM-4.5 GLM-4.5-Air
Parameters 355B total / 32B active 106B total / 12B active
Reasoning Modes Thinking Mode (complex tasks)
Non-Thinking Mode (simple queries)
Same
Context Window 128K tokens Same
Native Tool Calling ✅ Supported ✅ Supported
Access Z.ai Platform
HuggingFace
Same

Performance Benchmarks: Triple Capability Validation

(1) Agentic Abilities: Tool Usage & Web Interaction

Competitive results across three industry tests:

Benchmark GLM-4.5 Score Key Comparison
TAU-bench 70.1 Claude 4 Opus (70.5)
BFCL v3 77.8 Claude 4 Sonnet (75.2)
BrowseComp 26.4% o4-mini-high (28.3%)

Real-world application:
When asked “Latest breakthroughs in quantum computing for 2025”, GLM-4.5 autonomously uses browsing tools to retrieve recent papers and extracts key findings.


(2) Reasoning Capabilities: Math/Science/Logic Mastery

Benchmark GLM-4.5 Score Key Comparison
MMLU Pro 84.6 GPT-4.1 (85.3)
AIME24 91.0 Outperforms Claude 4 Opus (75.7)
MATH 500 98.2 Near-human expert level
Science (SciCode) 41.7 Leads open-source models

Note: Volatile benchmarks like AIME24 use 32-sample averaging for stability.


(3) Coding Prowess: Full-Stack Development

Real-world development validation:

Test GLM-4.5 Score Industry Comparison
SWE-bench Verified 64.2 Beats GPT-4.1 (48.6)
Terminal-Bench 37.5 Leads Gemini 2.5 Pro (25.3)
Tool Success Rate 90.6% Claude-4-Sonnet (89.5%)

Full-stack demonstration:
Command: “Create user management system with login UI and database” generates:

  • React frontend components
  • Flask backend APIs
  • MySQL schema
    Complete code: GitHub Repository

Technical Innovations: The Unification Framework

Architectural Breakthrough: Depth-Optimized MoE Design

Innovation GLM-4.5 Implementation Industry Differentiation
MoE Routing Loss-free balance + Sigmoid gating Prevents expert imbalance
Model Geometry Reduced width, increased depth Boosts reasoning (e.g., MMLU +12%)
Attention Mechanism 96-head Grouped-Query + Partial RoPE Efficient long-sequence processing
Training Optimizer Muon Optimizer Enables larger batches, faster convergence

Training Strategy: Four-Stage Capability Fusion

graph LR
A[General Pretraining] --> B[Code/Reasoning Specialization]
B --> C[Domain Fine-Tuning]
C --> D[Reinforcement Learning]
  1. General Pretraining: 15T token universal corpus
  2. Specialized Enhancement: 7T token code/reasoning corpus
  3. Domain Tuning: Medium-scale domain datasets (including instructions)
  4. RL Optimization: Reinforcement learning via slime framework

Reinforcement Learning Engine: slime’s Triple Innovation

Technical Challenge slime Solution Practical Impact
Slow data generation Decoupled architecture: Separate training/rollout 40%+ GPU utilization gain
Long-task instability Mixed precision: FP8 generation + BF16 training 3x throughput increase
Framework incompatibility Unified multi-agent interface Seamless Claude Code integration

Practical Applications: From Slides to Full-Stack Development

Application 1: Intelligent Presentation Creation

Workflow:

  1. User request: “Create 5-slide presentation about quantum computing”
  2. GLM-4.5 autonomously:

    • Searches web for updated content
    • Designs visual layouts
    • Outputs playable HTML slides

Application 2: End-to-End Web Development

Case Study:

  1. User provides basic template
  2. Iterative development via conversation:

    • “Add user comment feature”
    • “Integrate payment gateway”
  3. Outputs production-ready code
    Live Demo

Application 3: Toolchain Integration

Seamless compatibility with development ecosystems:

# Using GLM-4.5 with Claude Code
from claude_code import Agent
agent = Agent(model="glm-4.5")
agent.execute_task("Analyze sales.csv and generate visual report")

Supported frameworks:


Getting Started with GLM-4.5

Option 1: Online Access (Zero Setup)

  1. Visit Z.ai Platform
  2. Select “GLM-4.5” model
  3. Directly test capabilities:

    • Generate interactive games
    • Create physics simulations
    • Design marketing posters

Option 2: API Integration (Developers)

# OpenAI-compatible endpoint
curl https://api.z.ai/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "model": "glm-4.5",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Extract insights from this PDF..."}]
  }'

Full API Documentation

Option 3: Local Deployment (High Performance)

# vLLM deployment example
pip install vllm
python -m vllm.entrypoint \
  --model zai-org/glm-4.5-base \
  --tensor-parallel-size 4

Complete Deployment Guide


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: How does GLM-4.5 differ from GPT-4.1?

Key distinction: Capability unification

  • GLM-4.5: Single model handles reasoning/coding/tool use
  • GPT-4.1: Requires specialized models (e.g., Codex for programming)

Q2: Which version suits smaller projects – GLM-4.5 or Air?

Selection guide:

Scenario Recommended Rationale
Local deployment / Cost-sensitive GLM-4.5-Air 12B active parameters, lower resource needs
Complex tasks / Peak performance GLM-4.5 32B active parameters, 15%+ performance gain

Q3: How to troubleshoot failed tool calls?

Debugging steps:

  1. Activate Thinking Mode (not Non-Thinking Mode)
  2. Verify function descriptions follow OpenAPI specs
  3. Include examples: Provide tool-call demonstrations in prompts

Q4: Is commercial use permitted?

Licensing:

  • Z.ai API usage: Follow platform commercial policy
  • Local deployment: Apache 2.0 license for open weights

Conclusion: Toward General-Purpose AI

GLM-4.5 achieves unification through:

  1. Depth-optimized MoE architecture: Balances efficiency and reasoning
  2. Four-stage training: Integrates general and specialized capabilities
  3. slime RL framework: Solves long-horizon task challenges

First single model to simultaneously deliver:

  • Reasoning: Competition-level math (AIME24: 91.0)
  • Coding: Full-stack development (90.6% tool success)
  • Agents: Complex web interaction (BrowseComp beats Claude 4 Opus)

Experience now: https://chat.z.ai
Source code: GitHub Repository