Building a Full-Stack Research Agent with Gemini and LangGraph
Implementing Dynamic Search + Knowledge Iteration for Intelligent Q&A Systems
Have you ever faced this scenario?
When researching complex topics, traditional search engines return fragmented information. You manually sift through sources, verify accuracy, and piece together insights—a time-consuming process. This open-source solution using Google Gemini and LangGraph automates dynamic search → knowledge iteration → trusted answers with full citation support.
This guide explores a full-stack implementation covering:
-
✅ Zero-to-production deployment with React + LangGraph -
✅ The 7-step workflow of research agents -
✅ Docker deployment for production environments -
✅ Troubleshooting common issues (with tested code)
1. Core Capabilities: How AI Achieves “Human-Level Research”
Unlike static chatbots, this research agent simulates human inquiry through a dynamic closed-loop system:
graph LR
A[User Question] --> B[Generate Search Terms]
B --> C[Google Search]
C --> D[Analyze Results]
D --> E{Sufficient Knowledge?}
E -->|No| F[Generate New Queries]
E -->|Yes| G[Generate Cited Answer]
F --> C
Five key innovations:
-
Dynamic Query Generation
Gemini transforms vague questions into precise search terms (e.g., “quantum computing business applications” → “quantum computers financial modeling case studies 2024”) -
Knowledge Gap Detection
After each search, AI self-evaluates: “Does current data cover the core issue? What dimensions are missing?” -
Iterative Search Refinement
Conducts up to 5 search cycles (configurable) to overcome single-query limitations -
Verifiable Answer Generation
Every conclusion links to source materials -
Real-Time Streaming
Redis delivers progressive results during processing
💡 Technical Comparison: Standard ChatGPT plugins perform single searches, while this is the first open-source framework with “refine-iterate” capabilities.
2. 10-Minute Local Deployment Guide (Dev Mode)
Prerequisites
Tool | Version | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Node.js | v18+ | React frontend |
Python | 3.8+ | LangGraph backend |
Google Gemini | API Key | Get free key |
Launch in 3 Steps
# 1. Clone repository (~2 minutes)
git clone https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph.git
cd gemini-fullstack-langgraph
# 2. Configure backend (Critical!)
cd backend
cp .env.example .env
Add your Gemini API key to .env
:
GEMINI_API_KEY="YOUR_ACTUAL_KEY_HERE"
# 3. Launch full-stack service (auto hot-reload)
make dev
Access at http://localhost:5173/app
:

Interface components: Query input, real-time response stream, collapsible citations
3. Research Agent Deep Dive
Core logic in backend/src/agent/graph.py
implements seven phases:
Phase 1: Query Decomposition
def generate_queries(question):
prompt = f"""
User question: "{question}"
Generate 3-5 precise search terms with:
1. Professional terminology variants (e.g., "AI" and "Artificial Intelligence")
2. Time constraints (past 3 years unless historical)
3. Geographic filters (for policies/markets)
"""
return gemini_pro(prompt).split(";")
Example: “vaccine efficacy” → [“COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness 2024”, “mRNA vaccine long-term side effects”, “inactivated vs mRNA vaccine comparison”]
Phase 2: Parallel Web Research
Using Google Search API, Gemini:
-
Extracts core arguments -
Filters ads/low-quality sources -
Flags contentious claims
Phase 3: Knowledge Gap Analysis
AI generates reflection reports:
Current coverage:
✓ Quantum computing in drug discovery
✗ Financial sector case studies (missing post-2023 data)
✗ Manufacturing cost-benefit analysis (no Asian cases)
→ New queries: ["quantum computing supply chain optimization case studies 2023-2024"]
Phase 4: Iteration Control (Max 5 cycles)
MAX_LOOPS = 5 # Configurable
while gap_found and loop_count < MAX_LOOPS:
new_queries = generate_refined_queries()
do_web_research(new_queries)
loop_count += 1
Phase 5: Answer Synthesis
Gemini structures responses:
1. Core findings (≤3 sentences)
2. Evidence chain (≥3 independent sources)
3. Uncertainty disclosure (e.g., "Japanese market data unpublished")
4. Production Deployment Architecture
Scale-ready infrastructure:
Infrastructure Dependencies
Service | Required | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Redis | Yes | Real-time streaming (2000+ msgs/sec) |
PostgreSQL | Yes | Stores conversation history/task states |
Docker | Optional | Containerization |
Docker Deployment
# Build image (~5 minutes)
docker build -t gemini-fullstack-langgraph -f Dockerfile .
# Launch service (requires 2 keys)
docker-compose up -d \
-e GEMINI_API_KEY=your_key \
-e LANGSMITH_API_KEY=your_key
Access at http://your-server-ip:8123/app
Critical Configuration Parameters
Parameter | Default | Optimization Tip |
---|---|---|
MAX_SEARCH_QUERIES | 5 | Increase to 8 for complex topics |
REFLECTION_DEPTH | 2 | Set to 3 for high-precision tasks |
STREAMING_CHUNK_SIZE | 512 | Reduce to 256 for high concurrency |
📌 Note: Update
apiUrl
infrontend/src/App.tsx
for production environments
5. Tech Stack Analysis: Why These Tools?
Technology | Strengths | Role in Project |
---|---|---|
React+Vite | Hot reload <0.5s | Responsive frontend |
Tailwind+Shadcn | Atomic CSS, pre-built components | Rapid UI development |
LangGraph | Stateful workflow support | Agent orchestration engine |
Gemini Pro | 128K context + multimodal | Content understanding/generation |
Redis | <2ms message latency | Real-time streaming |
💡 Key Advantage: LangGraph’s
StateGraph
enables cyclical workflows impossible in standard LangChain.
6. Troubleshooting Guide (FAQ)
Q1: “Invalid Gemini API Key” error?
Verification Steps:
-
Confirm correct key in backend/.env
(no trailing spaces) -
Enable API access in Google AI Studio -
Test connectivity:
curl -X POST https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemini-pro:generateContent?key=YOUR_KEY
Q2: Frontend can’t connect to backend?
Diagnosis:
# 1. Check backend port (default: 2024)
lsof -i :2024
# 2. Test API endpoint
curl http://localhost:2024/healthcheck
# 3. Update frontend config
// In frontend/src/App.tsx
const apiUrl = import.meta.env.DEV
? "http://localhost:2024"
: "https://your-prod-domain.com"
Q3: How to improve answer quality?
Modify backend/src/config.py
:
# Deeper reflection (default: medium)
REFLECTION_MODE = "high"
# Broader search (default: 5 pages)
SEARCH_DEPTH = 8
7. Real-World Use Case
Scenario: Researching “Solar Cell Tech Breakthroughs”
Traditional Search Pain Points:
-
Manual separation of “lab research” vs. “commercial products” -
Difficulty tracking multinational patent trends
Agent Output:
1. Key Advances:
• Perovskite cells: 33.7% efficiency (NREL 2024)
• LONGi's silicon-perovskite tandem mass production (Source: PV Magazine)
2. Risks:
• Stability: Outdoor degradation exceeds industry standards (Source: Science)
• EU regulations: 95% recycling rate required from 2025 (Source: EC)
3. Emerging Trends:
• Korea's SNE solid-state PV roadmap (2026 pilot)
Source links direct to original documents
8. Conclusion: Value Proposition & Evolution
Current Capabilities:
-
✅ Handles open-ended research (market analysis, tech comparisons) -
✅ Generates academic/commercial draft reports -
⚠️ Unsuitable for math calculations/code debugging
Future Enhancements:
-
Multi-agent collaboration: Domain-specialist roles -
Cross-language research: Auto-translate non-English sources -
Private knowledge integration: Combine with internal documents
Licensed under Apache 2.0 for commercial use. This solution pioneers a new paradigm for professional research through dynamic search, knowledge iteration, and verifiable citations.
Source Code: github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph
Documentation: LangGraph Deployment Guide